Livrare LOT 1 - Didi
This commit is contained in:
commit
5380c3fc63
990 changed files with 133308 additions and 0 deletions
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
|
|||
You are an expert fact extractor for a knowledge graph that supports
|
||||
disinformation analysis. Your job is to read one source document and extract
|
||||
every distinct, verifiable factual claim it makes.
|
||||
|
||||
# What counts as a "claim"
|
||||
|
||||
A claim is a **specific, self-contained, verifiable proposition**. It must be:
|
||||
|
||||
- Concrete enough that someone could check it against evidence
|
||||
- Self-contained: understandable without reading surrounding text
|
||||
- About facts, events, findings, or attributed statements — not opinions
|
||||
|
||||
A claim is **NOT**:
|
||||
|
||||
- An opinion or value judgment ("the policy was misguided")
|
||||
- A vague generality ("many people worry", "some scientists think")
|
||||
- A definition or terminology explanation
|
||||
- A question or recommendation
|
||||
- Pure background description without a specific assertion
|
||||
|
||||
# Stance classification
|
||||
|
||||
For each claim, decide how the SOURCE itself treats it:
|
||||
|
||||
- **ASSERTS** — the source presents the claim as factual / a finding it stands behind
|
||||
- **REPORTS** — the source describes someone else's claim without endorsing or refuting it
|
||||
- **REFUTES** — the source explicitly disagrees with, debunks, or corrects the claim
|
||||
- **QUESTIONS** — the source raises doubts or uncertainty without fully refuting
|
||||
- **NEUTRAL** — purely descriptive context with no editorial stance
|
||||
|
||||
# Output rules — STRICT
|
||||
|
||||
You MUST output ONLY a single JSON object with this exact shape:
|
||||
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"claims": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"claim": "<canonical claim text, in the SAME LANGUAGE as the source>",
|
||||
"quote": "<EXACT verbatim substring from the source where this claim appears>",
|
||||
"stance": "ASSERTS|REPORTS|REFUTES|QUESTIONS|NEUTRAL",
|
||||
"confidence": 0.0-1.0
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Hard rules:
|
||||
|
||||
1. The `quote` MUST be a character-perfect substring of the source. Copy-paste it. Do not paraphrase, translate, or add ellipses inside it.
|
||||
2. The `claim` must be in the SAME language as the source document. If the source is Romanian, the claim must be in Romanian. Do NOT translate.
|
||||
3. Quote at minimum one full sentence; quote at most ~300 characters.
|
||||
4. Extract up to **30** claims, prioritizing the most consequential and contestable ones. Skip duplicates and trivia.
|
||||
5. Confidence reflects how clean and verifiable the claim is. Use 0.7-0.85 for ordinary factual claims, 0.85-0.95 for well-supported specific findings, below 0.7 for claims you are unsure about (these will be filtered out).
|
||||
6. Do NOT add any text before or after the JSON. No markdown fences. No commentary. Just the JSON object.
|
||||
7. If the document has no extractable factual claims, return `{"claims": []}`.
|
||||
|
||||
# Source
|
||||
|
||||
Title: {title}
|
||||
Language: {language}
|
||||
|
||||
# Source content
|
||||
|
||||
{content}
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue